| 
    
  : The existing provisions of the Income Tax  Act, 1961, have given birth to such myriad interpretations that its  practitioners are often left wondering that perhaps only Bhagwad Gita  could have more possible interpretations. Considering the sheer volume  of litigation arising, not to mention the moolah involved as a result  of differences in opinion of reading of complex clauses, simplification  of tax laws was the crying need of the hour.   The finance minister, while introducing the draft  Direct Tax Code (DTC) stressed the fact that DTC represents an attempt  to simplify the tax laws of the country by removing ambiguities and  thereby encouraging voluntary compliance by the taxpayers. One must  appreciate the vision of the finance minister and his team, including  the former finance minister, who had a significant say in shaping the  DTC in the form it exists today.   However, as it often happens, the intentions and  the vision of the legislators are sometimes not translated into black  and white and a slight omission here and a misplaced word there can  cause lot of discomfort to the tax payers, as many of the non-resident  oil & gas service providers may find out in near future.   Under the existing provisions of Section 44BB of  the Act, which has non-obstante clause overriding the other provisions  of the Act, non-resident service providers to oil & gas industry  enjoy a tax regime wherein 10% of the gross receipts are deemed to be  their income and tax is levied at the rate of 42.23% on the income so  determined, resulting into effective tax rate of 4.23%. Further the  section provides that non-resident service providers at their option,  can claim their actual taxable income to be lower than the deemed  income computed as mentioned above, by furnishing duly audited accounts  of the business to the tax authorities. Under the DTC, corresponding  provisions of Section 44BB of the Act can be found in serial numbers 6  & 7 of the Rule 1 of Schedule Fourteen. It is interesting to note  that this benefit shall not be available to service providers to the  natural gas exploration companies. The language used in the serial  numbers 6 & 7 of Rule 1 covers the assessees providing services in  connection with prospecting/extraction/production of mineral oil.   Mineral oil and natural gas are separately defined  in the DTC, unlike under the existing provisions wherein mineral oil is  defined to include natural gas. Therefore, it appears that the...   |